Part (iv) Estimated trends of problem stimulant use
Country | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | Drug use [1] | Method [1] |
---|
Czech Republic | : | : | 2.82 | 2.69 | 2.84 | 2.87 | PSU | CM |
Italy | : | : | 3.7 | 4.08 | 4.29 | 4.4 | PSU | MI |
Slovakia | : | : | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.08 | 0.83 | PSU | OT |
Notes:
Data represents a selection based on the availablity of the same calculation method over the time. In some countries more estimates might be available. The selection was made in order for the trend to be unbiased. In some countries data are insufficient to report. |
Target groups may vary between countries owing to different methods and data sources; therefore comparisons should be made with caution. |
For more details see Tables PDU-1, PDU-102 and PDU-103 in the Statistical bulletin 2010. |
See also ‘General notes for interpreting data’ on the Explanatory notes and help page |
See also EMCDDA project (2003): National prevalence estimates of problem drug use in the European Union, 1995–2000, CT.00.RTX.23, EMCDDA, Lisbon, coordinated by the Institut für Therapieforschung, Munich. |
[1] - POU = Problem opioid use; PDU = Problem drug use. TM = Treatment Multiplier ; HM = HIV Multiplier ; MM = Mortality Multiplier ; MI = Multivariate Indicator Method ; PM = Police Multiplier ; TP = Truncated Poisson ; CM = Combined Methods. CR = Capture Recapture, OT = Other Methods. | Sources:
Reitox national focal points |
2009 REITOX National Reports - Fonte PDU template |
(see the help page for information about formats etc.)