You are viewing archived content
Please note that this page is a static copy of a previously published web page and is no longer actively maintained.
Be aware that the information contained here may be out-of-date.
For the most recent information, we recommend visiting the main website of the EMCDDA.
Figure DRD-1. Proportion of drug-induced deaths that show presence of opioids for the most recent year reported
| Country | % | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| With opioids | |||
| Related links: | |||
| Belgium (2005) (N=105) | 26.7 | ||
| Czech Republic (2010) (N=55) | 34.5 | ||
| France (2009) (N=365) | 37.5 | ||
| Slovenia (2010) (N=25) | 48.0 | ||
| Lithuania (2010) (N=51) | 55.6 | ||
| Slovakia (2010) (N=20) | 60.0 | ||
| Latvia (2010) (N=7) | 71.4 | ||
| Denmark (2009) (N=222) | 74.9 | ||
| Italy (2010) (N=374) | 78.4 | ||
| Malta (2010) (N=5) | 80.0 | ||
| Hungary (2010) (N=17) | 82.4 | ||
| Romania (2010) (N=34) | 82.4 | ||
| United Kingdom (DSD) (2010) (N=2334) | 83.3 | ||
| Finland (2010) (N=156) | 86.5 | ||
| Sweden (2009) (N=267) | 87.3 | ||
| Cyprus (2010) (N=9) | 88.9 | ||
| Turkey (2010) (N=126) | 88.9 | ||
| Norway (2009) (N=285) | 89.5 | ||
| Portugal (2010) (N=52) | 90.4 | ||
| Ireland (2009) (N=203) | 92.3 | ||
| Croatia (2010) (N=73) | 95.1 | ||
| Estonia (2010) (N=101) | 99.0 | ||
| Luxembourg (2010) (N=12) | 100.0 | ||
| Austria (2010) (N=170) | 100.0 | ||
| Statistical bulletin 2006: Figure DRD-1 | |||
| Statistical bulletin 2007: Figure DRD-1 | |||
| Statistical bulletin 2008: Figure DRD-1 | |||
| Statistical bulletin 2009: Figure DRD-1 | |||
| Statistical bulletin 2010: Figure DRD-1 | |||
| Statistical bulletin 2011: Figure DRD-1 | |||
| See Table DRD-1 | |||
| See also ‘General notes for interpreting data’ on the Explanatory notes and help page | |||
Notes:
(1) For Czech Republic, EMCDDA Selection D was used instead of the national definition. National definition also includes poisoning by psychoactive medicines, which accounts for most cases.
In some countries, the ‘national definitions’ of drug-induced death include a limited number of cases of deaths indirectly related to drug use. See Methodological notes in the 2012 Statistical bulletin.
Although all cases are included in 'N', in some countries not all cases have information on toxicology. The proportions have been computed as valid percentages (see Table DRD-1).
Source:
Reitox national reports 2011 are taken from national mortality registries or special registries (forensic or police). Based on national definitions as presented in the 2012 Statistical bulletin, Methodological notes for drug-related deaths.
| With opioids | |
| Belgium (2005) (N=105) | 26.7 |
| Czech Republic (2010) (N=55) | 34.5 |
| France (2009) (N=365) | 37.5 |
| Slovenia (2010) (N=25) | 48.0 |
| Lithuania (2010) (N=51) | 55.6 |
| Slovakia (2010) (N=20) | 60.0 |
| Latvia (2010) (N=7) | 71.4 |
| Denmark (2009) (N=222) | 74.9 |
| Italy (2010) (N=374) | 78.4 |
| Malta (2010) (N=5) | 80.0 |
| Hungary (2010) (N=17) | 82.4 |
| Romania (2010) (N=34) | 82.4 |
| United Kingdom (DSD) (2010) (N=2334) | 83.3 |
| Finland (2010) (N=156) | 86.5 |
| Sweden (2009) (N=267) | 87.3 |
| Cyprus (2010) (N=9) | 88.9 |
| Turkey (2010) (N=126) | 88.9 |
| Norway (2009) (N=285) | 89.5 |
| Portugal (2010) (N=52) | 90.4 |
| Ireland (2009) (N=203) | 92.3 |
| Croatia (2010) (N=73) | 95.1 |
| Estonia (2010) (N=101) | 99.0 |
| Luxembourg (2010) (N=12) | 100.0 |
| Austria (2010) (N=170) | 100.0 |
drdfig1
| Demonstration | Reference | Type | Y Axis | X axis | Label | Width (%) | Height (px) | X plotline | Y plotline | Y min,max values | series Markers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| szrfig1 | column,column,line | Quantity (kg)|Number of seizures$3 | |||||||||
| szrfig2 | column,column,line | Quantity (kg)|Number of seizures$3 | |||||||||
| gpsfig4a | line | % | 500 | 0,30 | |||||||
| gpsfig1 | column | % | 500 | 0,25 | |||||||
| gpsfig2 | column,column,point | Contiuation rates %|LTP all adults$3 | |||||||||
| gpsfig18a | distribution | Estimated prevalence (%) | 0 | ||||||||
| gpsfig18b | distribution | Estimated prevalence (%) | 0 | ||||||||
| gpsfig20 | column | % | 600 | 0,20 | |||||||
| dlofig2 | stackedBar | % | 600 | ||||||||
| dlofig3 | line | Index (2005 = 100) | 68 | ||||||||
| dlofig3$ | pie | 1 073 752 reports (2010) |
30 | ||||||||
| dlofig4 | line | Index (2005 = 100) | 68 | ||||||||
| dlofig4$ | pie | 1 073 752 reports (2010) | 30 | ||||||||
| dlofig5 | line | Index (2005 = 100) | 68 | ||||||||
| dlofig5$ | pie | 189 792 reports (2010) | 30 | ||||||||
| drdfig12a | scatter | Ratio between DRD in 2003 and 2000 | Number of DRD in 2000 | 1 | |||||||
| drdfig12b | scatter | Ratio between DRD in 2009/10 and 2003 | Number of DRD in 2003 | 1 | |||||||
| hsrfig2 | stackedColumn | Clients in substitution treatment | |||||||||
| dlofig1 | line | Index (2005 = 100) | 90,140 | ||||||||
| drdfig1 | column | Country and total number of DRD | 600 | ||||||||
| drdfig2 | column | Proportion of DRD under the age of 25 (%) | 600 | ||||||||
| drdfig3 | line | Mean age in years | |||||||||
| drdfig4 | line | Mean age in years | |||||||||
| drdfig5a | line | Index (1990 = 100) | |||||||||
| drdfig5b | line | Index (1996 = 100) | |||||||||
| drdfig6 | line | Index (1990 = 100 %) | 80,160 | ||||||||
| drdfig7a | column | Mortality rate per million | |||||||||
| drdfig7b | column,point | Rate per million | |||||||||
| drdfig8 | line | Index (1985 = 100 %) | 50,650 | ||||||||
| drdfig9a | line | % | 0,70 | ||||||||
| drdfig9b | line | % | |||||||||
| drdfig9c | line | % | |||||||||
| drdfig10 | column | Mean age in years | 500 | ||||||||
| drdfig11a | line | Index | 0,300 | ||||||||
| drdfig11b | line | Index | |||||||||
| drdfig11c | line | Index | |||||||||
| drdfig13a | line | Number of cases | |||||||||
| drdfig13b | line | Number of cases | |||||||||
| eyefig1a | line | ||||||||||
| eyefig1b | line | ||||||||||
| eyefig1c | line | 0, | |||||||||
| eyefig1d | line | % | 45 | 800 | |||||||
| eyefig1d$ | line | % | 45 | 800 | |||||||
| gpsfig3 | column | % | 500 | ||||||||
| gpsfig4b | line | % | |||||||||
| gpsfig5 | column | % | |||||||||
| gpsfig6 | column | % | |||||||||
| gpsfig7 | column | % | |||||||||
| gpsfig8a | line | % | 0, | ||||||||
| gpsfig8b | line | % | 0, | ||||||||
| gpsfig9a | column | % | |||||||||
| gpsfig9b | column | % | |||||||||
| gpsfig10 | line | % | |||||||||
| gpsfig11 | column,column,point | Continuation rates (%)| LTP All adults$3 | |||||||||
| gpsfig12a | line | % | 0, | ||||||||
| gpsfig12b | line | % | 0, | ||||||||
| gpsfig13 | column,column,point | % | |||||||||
| gpsfig14a | line | % | 0, | ||||||||
| gpsfig14b | line | % | 0, | ||||||||
| gpsfig15 | column | % | |||||||||
| gpsfig16 |
column,column,point |
Continuation rates (%)|LTP All adults$3 | 0, | ||||||||
| gpsfig17 | column | % | |||||||||
| gpsfig21a | line | % | 0, | ||||||||
| gpsfig21b | line | % | 0, | ||||||||
| gpsfig22 | column,column,point | Continuation rates (%)| LTP All adults$3 | |||||||||
| gpsfig23a | line | % | |||||||||
| gpsfig23b | line | % | |||||||||
| gpsfig23c | line | % | |||||||||
| gpsfig23d | line | % | 0, | ||||||||
| gpsfig23e | line | % | 0, | ||||||||
| hsrfig4 | pie | % of prison population in OST | 30 | ||||||||
| inffig1a | line | New AIDS cases per million population | 700 | 0, | |||||||
| inffig1b | line | New AIDS cases per million population | 700 | 0, | |||||||
| inffig2a | line | Cases per million population | 0, | ||||||||
|
inffig2b |
line |
Cases per million population | 0, | ||||||||
| inffig2c | line | Cases per million population | |||||||||
| inffig2d | line | Cases per million population | |||||||||
| inffig3a | distribution | % | 0, | National;Subnational|square;rgba(0,0,0,0.8);triangle;rgba(0,0,255,0.8) | |||||||
| inffig3b | distribution | % | 0, | National;Subnational|square;rgba(0,0,0,0.8);triangle;rgba(0,0,255,0.8) | |||||||
| inffig3c | distribution | % | 0, | National;Subnational|square;rgba(0,0,0,0.8);triangle;rgba(0,0,255,0.8) | |||||||
| inffig6a | distribution | % | 0, | National;Subnational|square;rgba(0,0,0,0.8);triangle;rgba(0,0,255,0.8) | |||||||
| inffig6b | distribution | % | 0, | National;Subnational|square;rgba(0,0,0,0.8);triangle;rgba(0,0,255,0.8) | |||||||
| inffig6c | distribution | % | 0, | National;Subnational|square;rgba(0,0,0,0.8);triangle;rgba(0,0,255,0.8) | |||||||
| inffig9a | distribution | % | 0, | National;Subnational|square;rgba(0,0,0,0.8);triangle;rgba(0,0,255,0.8) | |||||||
| inffig9b | distribution | % | 0, | National;Subnational|square;rgba(0,0,0,0.8);triangle;rgba(0,0,255,0.8) | |||||||
| pppfig1 | line | Index (2005 = 100) | |||||||||
| pppfig2 | line | Index (2005 = 100) | |||||||||
| tdifig1a | line | % | |||||||||
| tdifig1b | line | ||||||||||
| tdifig2a | pie | 30 | |||||||||
| tdifig2b | pie | 50 | |||||||||
| tdifig3a | line | % | |||||||||
| tdifig3b | line | ||||||||||
| tdifig7 | line | % | 60 | 0, | |||||||
| tdifig7$ | stackedColumn | Numbers | 38 | ||||||||
| hsrfig1b | percentStackedColumn | % | |||||||||
| Distirbuted points with specific markers and colours | inffig6a | distribution | % | National;Subnational|square;rgba(0,0,0,0.8);triangle;rgba(0,0,255,0.8) | |||||||