logo of the EU drugs agency

You are viewing archived content

Please note that this page is a static copy of a previously published web page and is no longer actively maintained.
Be aware that the information contained here may be out-of-date.
For the most recent information, we recommend visiting the main website of the EMCDDA.

Table TDI-7. Data coverage, 2010 or most recent year available

Part (ii) Units by country and type of treatment centre and reporting status

CountryOutpatient centresInpatient centresOther agencies
Units coveredUnits in the countryUnits coveredUnits in the countryUnits coveredUnits in the countryTypes of other agency
Belgium633153514749Low-threshold agencies
Bulgaria2345815:::
Czech Republic9414250577073Low-threshold agencies
Denmark911004450:::
Germany932169121147195383Low-threshold agencies and Treatment units in prison
Estonia1::::1313Outpatient and Inpatient centres
Ireland2152563757293360General practitioners, Low-threshold ahencies and Treatment units in prisons
Greece6168121427Low-threshold agencies
Spain2505541::::Outpatient centres and treatment units in prisons
France1372032545816Treatment units in prison
Italy189520:::::
Cyprus161633:::
Latvia33460:::::
Lithuania9494:::::
Luxembourg665722Low-threshold agencies and Treatment units in prison
Hungary5170142529:Low-threshold agencies and Treatment units in prison
Malta4::::55Outpatient and inpatient treatment centres, low-threshold agencies and units in prison
Netherlands5:2101012:::
Austria1281382738:::
Poland613222293376:::
Portugal77979:::::
Romania5050162055Treatment units in prison
Slovenia1819:::::
Slovakia11246751841239Treatment units in prison
Finland42:36::::
Sweden134437156306:51Treatment units in prison
Uk:::::::
Croatia23233233:::
Turkey::1522:::
Norway158159158159:::
 

Notes:

: Indicates no data available

(1) Data are from outpatient, inpatient treatment centres and prisons (aggregated data).

(2) Data are from 2009.

(3) In 2010 Latvia submitted a new dataset with a more precise TDI EMCDDA definition. Caution should be made when comparing data with previous years.

(4) Data refers to outpatient and inpatient treatment centres, low-threshold services and prisons (aggregated data).

(5) Data are from outpatient, inpatient treatment centres and Low-threshold services (aggregated data).

(6) Data are from 2009. Double counting is not eliminated in data from inpatient centres. Numbers presented in table in scope of inpatient data are sume of data collected by two separated systems (TDI pilot project and Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology (IPiN) system). There is an overlap between the systems in inpatient data and due to that double counting is not eliminated between systems. Double counting is eliminated independently in each data collection system (TDI pilot project and IPiN systems). Caution should be made when interpreting the data.

(7) In 2010 came into implementation a new national information system implying methodological changes particularly in the registration criteria. Caution should be made when comparing 2010 data with previous years.

See also ‘General notes for interpreting data’ on the Explanatory notes and help page.

Source:

Reitox national reports 2011 — Table TDI by centre type.

Page last updated: Monday, 09 July 2012